Skip to Main Content

April 6, 2026

Managing Liability on Major Public Sector Construction Projects with an Owner-Controlled Insurance Program

Explore how OCIP construction programs centralize insurance, enhance transparency, and support claims management for large public sector projects.

Summary

  • OCIPs centralize insurance coverage for large public construction projects.
  • Contractor insurance often lacks transparency and may delay claims.
  • OCIPs align coverage limits with project risks and may extend protection.
  • Centralized insurance lets owners file claims directly, which may speed repairs.
  • OCIPs enforce safety standards, aiming to reduce risk across all contractors.

Large public sector construction projects—like stadiums, airports, and transportation infrastructure—are complex efforts involving many contractors, subcontractors, and design professionals. In 2025 alone, megaprojects accounted for $197 billion in construction starts across the United States. With such significant investments, managing risk and liability effectively is key to helping keep projects on track, on budget, and successful overall.

One of the biggest challenges public entities face is how insurance coverage is structured. Traditionally, many projects rely on contractor-provided insurance policies. But this fragmented approach can lead to coverage gaps, limited transparency, and delays in claims recovery. A growing alternative is the Owner-Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP), which centralizes insurance coverage under the project owner, offering a more coordinated and comprehensive way to manage risk.

The risks of contractor-provided insurance 

Contractor-sourced insurance often may not fully address the unique exposures of large public construction projects. Here are some common challenges: 

  • Inadequate coverage limits: Contractors usually carry insurance policies covering multiple projects at once. This means coverage limits might not be sufficient for a single megaproject, potentially leaving owners exposed to uncovered losses.
  • Lack of transparency: Insurance costs are often bundled into contractor bids, sometimes inflating project costs by as much as 20%, according to industry data. Owners may have limited insight into how these costs are structured or whether coverage matches project risks.
  • Delayed claims recovery: When losses happen, owners may need to pursue claims across multiple contractors, engineers, and architects. This fragmented process can take years, delaying repairs and increasing legal and consulting expenses.

A real-world example comes from the Allen Independent School District’s $60 million football stadium in Texas. Shortly after opening, the stadium was declared unsafe due to major structural issues. Because insurance was spread across multiple contractors rather than centralized, the district was only able to recover $1.7 million in damages—far less than needed to fix the problems.

Across the country, more sports authorities, municipalities, school districts, and other public entities are delivering increasingly complex capital projects.

What is an Owner-Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP)?

An OCIP is a master insurance program purchased and managed by the project owner. It covers all contractors, subcontractors, and design professionals working on the project under a single, coordinated policy. This centralized approach offers several potential benefits:

  • Dedicated coverage limits: OCIPs set insurance limits specifically aligned with the project’s value, aiming to help ensure adequate protection without the risk of diluted coverage.
  • Streamlined claims process: Owners typically file claims directly with the insurer, which can potentially enable faster resolution and repair work without lengthy litigation.
  • Extended coverage: OCIPs often provide protection beyond project completion, covering latent defects or structural issues that may arise after construction ends.
  • Improved safety and risk management: OCIPs usually require contractors to follow consistent safety standards, reporting procedures, and training, fostering a safer work environment and reducing overall risk.

Builder’s risk policies vs. OCIPs

Public entities can also use builder’s risk policies alongside or instead of OCIPs, depending on project size and risk profile:

  • Builder’s risk policies: These provide first-party coverage for physical damage to the project during construction, such as fire, severe weather, vandalism, or structural collapse. Builder’s risk is commonly used on projects starting around $75 million.
  • OCIPs: These programs coordinate liability coverage across all contractors and professionals, including general liability, excess liability, and professional liability. OCIPs are generally suited for infrastructure projects exceeding $500 million.

Choosing the right insurance structure becomes increasingly important as projects grow in scale and complexity.

Benefits of centralized insurance coverage

Centralizing insurance coverage through an OCIP may strengthen oversight and reduce risk in several ways:

  • Enhanced transparency: Owners gain clearer visibility into insurance costs and coverage terms, helping with better budget management.
  • Consistent safety standards: A unified program enforces safety protocols across all contractors, potentially reducing accidents and claims.
  • Financial protection: Dedicated limits and comprehensive coverage aims to protect the full scope of the project investment.
  • Faster claims resolution: First-party coverage allows owners to avoid lengthy third-party lawsuits, potentially speeding up repairs and minimizing downtime.

For more detailed answers and data-driven recommendations, download the full report to support your team in navigating these challenges.

Want to learn how to protect your public construction project with an OCIP?

Explore our insights here.

Contributor

Placeholder Image

Johnny Fontenot

Senior Executive VP | National Public Entity Practice Leader